Digging Deep

July 26, 2010

Be Filled With The Spirit

(this one’s a little tiny bit technical for a just bit…but the practical payoff is totally worth it!  :)   )

I spent most of July in Guatemala, lecturing on the book of Ephesians to pastors and ministers from all over Central and South America.  Preparing and delivering those lectures was a very enriching time for me and I will probably just go ahead, bite the bullet and write a full-length commentary.  In the meantime, though, I wanted to jot down one or two thoughts that have been particularly impactful.  Today, I want to focus on Eph. 5:18:  …and do not get drunk on wine, in which is dissapation, but instead be filled with the Spirit.

For many Christians, this is a familiar command, yet one which is not easily put into practice.  It’s hard not to read this verse and wonder, “How exactly can I do that?”  The not-getting-drunk part is easy to apply, but the be-filled-with-the-Spirit part is a little less concrete, isn’t it?  I remember when I was involved with Campus Crusade for Christ back in Kent, Ohio in the early 90’s, the staff used to talk about something called “spiritual breathing” in which we were to breathe out sin (i.e. confess our sin to God) and breathe in the power of the Holy Spirit (i.e. appropriate the power of the Holy Spirit for Christian living).  This was an attempt to make Paul’s command in Eph. 5:18 practical on a daily basis, an attempt which I fully endorse.  However, as well-intentioned as the attempt was, it fell a bit short in terms of actual practicality.  “Breathe in/appropriate the power of the Holy Spirit” is really no less abstract than Paul’s original command.

However, in my recent work on Ephesians I realized that Paul’s command is not abstract at all.  In fact, Paul gave us very explicit, practical instruction on how to go about being filled with the Spirit.  This instruction immediately follows the command in question:

speaking to one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody with your heart to the Lord; always giving thanks for all things in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ to God, even the Father; and being subject to one another in the fear of Christ. (Eph. 5:19-21)

Here, Paul uses five verbs, each of which gives us practical instruction on how to be filled by the Spirit.   Actually, to be technically accurate, it might be better to say that Paul instructs us how to position ourselves to be filled by the Holy Spirit.  The Holy Spirit is God, of course, and therefore is not subject to our will.  We cannot “make” the Holy Spirit do anything, but we can do things which make us ready to take advantage of the Holy Spirit’s preferred mode of operation.  When Paul says “be filled with the Holy Spirit”, the form of the verb “be filled” reflects this reality.  In the Greek, this verb is a present, passive imperative which is slightly odd.  See, the passive form suggests something that is done to us, rather than something that is done be us…hence “be filled” rather than “fill yourselves”.  Yet the fact that this is an imperative means that there is something which we must actively do in order for this to happen.  So while we cannot “fill ourselves” with the Spirit, we can put ourselves in a position to “be filled” by the Spirit and the five verbs in vv.19-21 outline what it is that we are to do.

Now I should probably point out that not all commentators agree with me on this.  In fact, it appears to me that most commentators take the five verbs in vv.19-21 as the results of being filled by the Spirit rather than the means to being filled by the Spirit.  Thus, most commentators think that being filled by the Spirit will result in speaking to one another in songs and hymns and spiritual songs, singing, making music, giving thanks and being subject to one another.  This interpretation is quite possible, because the five verbs in question here are actually participles which are usually translated in English with an “ing” ending:  speaking, singing, thanking, etc.  And participles may sometimes denote the results of an earlier verb, so I understand how commentators can come to this conclusion. 

However, I disagree with taking these participles as the result of being filled with the Spirit for basically four reasons.  First, if these verbs denote the result of being filled with the Spirit, then we have no practical instruction on how to go about doing what we are commanded to do.  Second, while participles can denote result of an earlier verb, they do not usually do so and probably shouldn’t be understood this way unless there is a clear indication of this in the text, such as the presence of a purpose-word (“so that…”, “in order that…”, etc.).  No such clear indication is present in Eph. 5.  Third, if these five actions are the result of being filled with the Spirit, then no further instruction regarding them would be required.  What I mean is that if being filled with the Spirit results in singing, then this singing is essentially out of our control.  No further instruction on how to sing would be necessary.  And yet these five participles have accompanying instruction, some of which are even in the form of imperatives (direct commands).  We are told what kinds of songs to sing, when to be thankful and given extensive instruction on how to “be subject to one another.”  This instruction goes on well into chapter 6.  But all of this instruction makes little sense if the verbs in question are themselves results.  That would be like saying “jump out of the window with the result that you are falling and I command you to hit the ground at a speed of 60 m.p.h.!”

The fourth reason I differ from many/most commentators in my interpretation of this passage is simply that understanding these verbs as means rather than results fits perfectly with other clear biblical teaching.  Why should singing praise and songs of adoration lead to being filled by the Spirit?  Because as Psalm 22:3 states, “[God] you are holy, enthroned on the praises of Israel”.[1]  This theme is echoed in other places as well, including Mat. 18:20.  Why should thankfulness lead to being filled by the Spirit?  Because in gratitude we focus on what God has done and thus align ourselves with His purposes rather than being fixated on our circumstances.  Why should ”being subject to one another” lead to being filled with the Spirit?  Because being subject to one another leads to unity and unity within the body of Christ grants us access to the Holy Spirit’s power.  This is a significant theme in Ephesians and is emphasized in many other parts of the New Testament as well. 

On the whole, then, I think it’s pretty clear that Paul is giving us solid, practical instruction on how to go about fulfilling the command to be filled with the Holy Spirit:  we are to worship God in song, we are to be thankful to him in all things and we are to be subject to one another, fostering unity within the body.

One final issue which some of you more observant readers may have already  noted:  understood this way, the command to “be filled with the Holy Spirit” is a command to the church rather than to individuals.  In other words, Paul is giving instruction here on how the church is to operate so that the church will be filled with the Holy Spirit.  This is not a command or instructions for individual believers.  Again, this goes against the grain of most popular teaching on the subject, but two things should be noted.  First, in the original Greek, the command is clearly plural, stressing the communal nature of the instruction.  The lack of a second person plural in English makes this difficult to bring out in translation but it is clear in the original.  Second, saying that the command to “be filled with the Spirit” is intended for the church as a whole does not mean that it does not also apply to individuals.  In fact, this command will only be fulfilled in the church as a whole to the extent that it is fulfilled in the lives of the individuals who make up that church.

So…if we want to experience the power of God in our churches, the answer’s probably not the newest church-growth technique or the latest preaching fad.  If we want to see God move in power among us, maybe we should be concentrating on what God has already told us to do in order to get ready for precisely that!


[1] There is some question about the translation of this line.  In addition to the normal translation given above it could also be rendered as “yet you are enthroned as the Holy one, You are the praise of Israel.”  However, this translation, while possible, seems awkward given the original Hebrew word-order.  Moreover, the LXX Greek translation of this line favors the more common translation given above.

July 21, 2010

New Airbender Movie Review

Filed under: Faith & Culture, Movies, Stacey Tuttle — admin @ 8:37 AM

Check out the new resource for using the moving The Last Airbender as an entry point for conversations about spiritual truth.  Article is here.

June 24, 2010

Fear & God’s Will

Filed under: Christian Living, Encouragement, God's Will, John Stone — John Stone @ 5:44 AM

By: John Stone

In our town, we have a tradition each June for parents of graduates to host parties to celebrate the accomplishments of their children.  It is always interesting to talk with the different students and ask about their plan for the coming future.  Answers each year range from the well thought-out to the completely ambiguous.  Most are asking the age-old question of how they can determine God’s will for themselves. 

Initially, I thought about sharing some suggestions concerning how to discern the will of God (e.g. fasting, praying, seeking wise counsel, and waiting on the Lord’s movement for direction).  However, at one of these parties, a young man who just finished college asked me to catch a coffee with him.  We met earlier this week and he shared very candidly that he feels a bit paralyzed as to what his next move should be.  He expressed concern that he might make the wrong choice, and this immobilizes him. 

As I asked him some questions, it became clear to both of us that his paralysis is rooted in fear.  For him, this fear originated from a skewed belief that comes from a phrase often espoused within the church.  It goes something like this:  God has a perfect and a permissive will.  The scope of this article isn’t to defend or deny this, but instead to highlight how this thinking can forge a false belief about God’s character.

 If we don’t sin and make all the right choices God wants us to make, then we get to live a fantastic life within His perfect will.  However, when we sin, or make a choice that really wasn’t God’s best, we are forced to settle for God’s permissive will.  Taking a misstep in a small area might not seem too devastating, but what if I marry the wrong person, or take the wrong job?  Now my whole life has been fouled up by my bad choice!  It’s no wonder that my young friend feels a great weight in his decision.  The sorrow that comes from thinking we’ve missed God’s perfect will usually leads not to repentance, but to death.  

Please understand that I strongly believe in making decisions based on the criterion I referenced earlier.  We must seek the Lord and do our best to discern His direction for us.  Even when we’re unsure how to move, however, we must resist the enemy’s call to fearfully freeze into inactivity.  Instead we can and must rest in the freedom that Romans 8:28-29 brings us.  God works all things together for the good of those who love Him and are called according to His purpose.  There is nothing I can do (including making poor decisions outside His will) that can thwart His purposes in my life.

 In this way, our confidence in decision-making is rooted in a proper understanding of God’s character rather than our own ability to choose correctly.  Regardless of our sin, poor choices, or lack of taking God’s “perfect” direction, God remains faithful to us.  We can experience freedom in decision-making because of God’s faithfulness and power.

 If you’ve made a decision that you currently regret, the hope is that God has not doomed you to a life of second-best.  Even now, He is at work to conform you to the character of Christ.  If you are in the midst of making a decision (big or small), seek the Lord and know that regardless of your decision He will accomplish His purposes in you. 

 My young friend and I ended our conversation that day by reminding one another that God has not given us a spirit of fear, but one of power, love, and a sound mind (2 Timothy 1:7).  May He give you the grace today to resist fear and move boldly in that spirit of power, love and a sound mind.

To find out more about John Stone, visit his Christian speaker home page here

June 15, 2010

Plastic Jesus

I’m speaking at a Christian camp/conference up in Wisconsin right now and I’ve been reminded of something that continues to drive me in ministry.  I remember watching a little girl many years ago as her parents took her up to look at a nativity scene on the lawn of the church.  Seeing the bundle of cloth in Mary’s arms, the little girl leaned over and looked inside the folds. 

“Who’s that?” she asked her parents.

“Well, that’s Jesus!” they replied.

The little girl leaned forward and rapped baby Jesus on the head with her knuckles.

“But he’s plastic!” the little girl exclaimed.

I think we all too often ask people to follow a plastic Jesus:  a Jesus who is slick and shiny and impervious to the elements and hollow inside.  In short, a Jesus who isn’t real.  We skim over the stories and camp on the obvious and offer surface-level answers to deep and difficult questions.  And then we get frustrated when they don’t seem to “get” it.  No wonder.  What we’re asking them to “get” doesn’t deserve their time or their attention and certainly not their lives. 

But the more I strive to show people the real Jesus, the Jesus who bursts unbidden from the pages of the Gospels if only you give him half a chance, the more convinced I am that people will do anything to follow him…if only we let them see him as he is.

Probably my favorite moment in ministry for this whole year…maybe for this decade…came today.  A middle-school girl asked me a question about “really all of it, you know…the whole heaven and hell thing.  The cross and forgiveness, you know?  I mean, I don’t get it.  How can Jesus do that?  What are they talking about?”

So I explained it.   God’s plan of salvation and all that, you know?  And as I talked I could see her connecting to it for maybe the first time, not because my explanation was clearer than any she’d heard before, but because I had been working so hard to let the kids see the real Jesus and now, suddenly, she saw Jesus as a real person who did this real thing for her on a real cross and…well, I guess it was just real for the first time.

When I was done, she looked at me for a long moment and then said, “Oh…” and this big smile lit up her face.  “Oh…so that’s what it all means.  I get it!” 

It just doesn’t get any better than that.

May 20, 2010

The Bible in an Age of Skepticism

Christian speaker and author Craig Smith speaks about the Bible in an age of skepticism on Daystar TV.


Buy the book here.

May 3, 2010

The Word: Understanding & Trusting the Bible in an Age of Skepticism

Video interview with Dr. Craig Smith, Christian speaker and author of the new book, The Word:  Understanding & Trusting the Bible in an Age of Skepticism.


You can buy a copy of the book at any of the following locations:

Shepherd Project Resource Store

Amazon

Barnes & Noble

April 30, 2010

National Day of Prayer

Filed under: Christian Living, Craig Smith, Faith & Culture — Tags: — Craig Smith @ 7:46 AM

Although I honestly doubt that much will come of this absurd ruling by the Wisconsin judge that the National Day of Prayer is unconstitutionial, I’d like to recommend Jim Daley’s article to you:

(http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/jim_daly/2010/04/a_day_of_prayer_for_judicial_common_sense.html)

April 23, 2010

Making Right

Filed under: Christian Living, Craig Smith, Ethics, Morality, Philosophy, Theology — Tags: , , , , , , — Craig Smith @ 4:45 AM

A common question I get asked a Christian teacher:  what makes some things right and some things wrong?

The simplistic answer often given to this important question is that the Bible defines right and wrong, but there are two problems with this answer.  First, the Bible doesn’t directly address every question of right and wrong that we will encounter.  Second, the Bible is a means of revelation, not of determination.  In other words, the Bible doesn’t determine right and wrong, it merely reveals it, like turning a spotlight on a fence in a dark field.  As soon as you see the fence you know if you’re on the right or wrong side of the fence, but without the spotlight you might not even know there was a fence.  But the spotlight isn’t the fence, it merely reveals the fence.  So what is the fence?  What makes the authoritative determination of what is right and what is wrong?

As I see it, there are essentially three thee loci of right/wrong:  the nature of God, the nature of God’s creation and the nature of God’s will.  While there is some interconnectedness of all three, they can be thought of as distinct loci.

The first locus is the nature of God.  These are moral truths that depend on what God is like.  For example, lying is wrong because God is truth.  God Himself cannot lie (Heb. 6:18)  because His essential nature is truthful. Faithfulness is right because God is faithful, love is right because God is love, etc.  These are necessary (in the philosophical sense; i.e. they can’t be any other way), transcendent and unchanging truths.  God could never make a world where these moral truths didn’t apply because God Himself never changes in His essential nature. 

The second locus is the nature of God’s creation.  These are moral truths that emerge from the way God set the universe up.  I believe the prohibitions against homosexuality fit into this category.  There is no particular reason why we have to have 2 genders (male and female) that come together in marriage and produce children.  God could have made it so that there were 4 or 48!  He could have even created us so that there was only 1 gender and we spawned children like polyps!  If He had created humans in one of these other ways, the prohibitions against homosexuality wouldn’t apply.  However…we don’t live in that universe.  The universe that we inhabit was set up with 2 genders and homosexuality was forbidden because it goes against the way God created this universe to function.  These second kind of moral truths are also unchanging, at least so long as we inhabit this universe.  They are not, however, necessary because they do not directly emerge from God’s unchanging nature.

The third locus of right and wrong is the nature of God’s will.  So, for instance, God told the Israelites not to eat pork.  There is nothing inherently wrong with pork.  In fact, before His covenant with Moses and the people of Israel, God allowed people to eat pork (see Gen. 9:3).  Moreover, Jesus declared all foods clean in Mar. 7:19, so pork was and is acceptable food for humans generally…but not for the Israelites during the O.T. covenant.  Why?  Well, we can speculate on why, but I think it boils down to making the Israelites noticably distinct.  But that’s another discussioin.  My point here is simply this:  pork isn’t inherently bad, but God told the Israelites not to eat it.  If they did eat it, it was considered a moral lapse and atonement was required.  In other words, this instance of right and wrong emerged from what God told them to do.  The same holds true for individuals.  If God told me to go into ministry and I didn’t, I would be sinning.  But if you haven’t been called to ministry, then not going into ministry isn’t a sin.  Again, what makes the choice about not going into ministry right or wrong is God’s will for each of us.  So, this particular locus of right and wrong is neither transcendent nor unchanging.  It can change as God reveals a new phase of His plan for His people (either corporately or individually).

So there’s my take on making right:  right emerges from the nature of God, from the nature of God’s creation or the nature of God Himself.

April 21, 2010

Cultic Prostitution?

Filed under: Biblical Studies, Craig Smith, Theology — Tags: , , , — Craig Smith @ 7:10 AM

How’s that for a provocotive post title? 

One of my favorite things about being a Christian speaker and teacher is that I get asked all kinds of interesting questions.  Today I was asked about whether God forbids prostitution or merely forbids temple prostitution (also called cultic prostitution; the act of engaging in prostitution as part of a religious observance).  The reason for the question is that the Bible seems to speak most directly against temple prostitution but has less direct prohibitions against prostitution more generally. 

In reality, however, the Bible prohibits all forms of prostitution fairly clearly, although there’s a translation difficulty that can make this issue seem less clear than it actually is.

For instance, Deu. 23:17-18 uses the two Hebrew words for prostitution, qadesh and zanahNone of the daughters of Israel shall be a cult prostitute (qadesh), nor shall any of the sons of Israel be a cult prostitute (qadesh).  18 “You shall not bring the hire of a harlot (zanah) or the wages of a dog into the house of the LORD your God for any votive offering, for both of these are an abomination to the LORD your God.

Within Semitic language groups generally, qadesh meant a cultic prostitute whereas zanah was more typically used of a common prostitute.  However, Deu 23:17-18 connects them as being essentially the same by speaking of cultic prostitutes and then immediately stating that the wages earned by a common prostitute (zanah) could not be brought into the temple.  While this does not explicitly forbid common prostitution in the same way that it forbids cultic prostitution, it is is clearly a prohibition against any woman or man being either kind of prostitute (i.e. if the money earned by prostitution was unacceptable to the Lord, then even more so is the means by which it was earned).

Every occurrence of qadesh in the Hebrew Bible appears to be paired with zanah, strongly suggesting that the Hebrews saw no distinction between cultic and common prostitution.  That being the case, the prohibition of Deu 23:17 should probably be translated as “none of the daughters of Israel shall be a prostitute” instead of  “…none…shall be a cult prostitute.”  Again, while some Semitic languages used the two words distinctly, the Hebrew usage of qadesh and zanah appear to be essentially synonymous.

Support for this translation is found in the LXX which renders both qadesh and zanah as pornē (There shall not be a harlot (pornē ) of the daughters of Israel, and there shall not be a fornicator (pornē ) of the sons of Israel; there shall not be an idolatress of the daughters of Israel, and there shall not be an initiated person of the sons of Israel. 18 Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot (pornē ), nor the price of a dog into the house of the Lord thy God, for any vow; because even both are an abomination to the Lord thy God).  This clearly means that the first translators of the Hebrew Bible understand the two Hebrew terms to be synonymous. 

Consequently, although some English translations distinguish between the two Hebrew terms, translating one as a cultic prostitute and the other as a common prostitute, this distinction is probably not intended in the majority of the Old Testament passage which use the two words (although there are certainly some places where the distinction may still be meaningful).  Thus, prohibitions against “temple prostitution” are almost always prohibitions against “common prostitution as well.”

April 12, 2010

Filed under: Christian Living, Craig Smith, Encouragement — Tags: , , — Craig Smith @ 3:17 PM

The following is an excerpt from a recent message.  Listen to the full audio version here.

Because we all get the spiritual wind knocked out of our sails from time to time, God commands us to encourage one another.  But what does Biblical encouragement look like?  It’s not just saying “you can do it!”  Biblical encouragement isn’t a pep-talk.  It’s a pit-crew.  It’s not someone standing on the sidelines saying “go get ‘em!” but someone waiting on deck to change your tires, fuel you up and get you back out on the track. 

Let me offer three characteristics of Biblical encouragement:

 1.   Biblical encouragement is steeped in God’s Word

 Biblical encouragement is steeped in God’s Word.   See, encouragement begins with the end in mind.  It seeks to give someone what they need to move from where they are to where they need to be.  But if we’re trying to move them to where we want them to be, then our “encouragement” is really nothing more than selfishness.  When a husband “encourages” his wife to go out and have some girl-time with her friends so that he can watch the game without being interrupted, that’s not biblical encouragement. Biblical encouragement seeks to move someone from where they are to where God says they need to be, and to do that we need to understand from His word where they need to be.

 Biblical encouragement has to be steeped in God’s Word because biblical encouragement depends on truth, not platitudes.  Biblical encouragement doesn’t sing “the sun will come out, tomorrow!” No, it says, “God has not given up on you.  God will never give up on you and He who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion.”

 2.  Biblical encouragement is discerning. 

 Biblical encouragement is discerning.  It recognizes that different people are encouraged by different things and that different circumstances call for different kinds of encouragement.  By the way, I think there are basically four kinds of encouragement:  affirmation, consolation, exhortation and edification.

 a.  Affirmation – helps people see their value and potential, especially when they’ve lost sight of it.  Affirmation can take the form of words or of actions.  You know that game “strength bombardment”?  It’s where someone sits in the center of a circle and everyone else talks about their good qualities.  Some people are really encouraged by that kind of affirmation.  Personally, I hate that game.  I’d rather pull out my own fingernails than sit through that.  But trust me with a significant task because you believe I can do it well, and I’m affirmed. 

 b.  Consolation – recognizes the pain that people feel and acknowledges the legitimacy of their wounds while at the same time helping them see past the horizon of their suffering.

 c.  Exhortation – calls people to live in light of what they know rather than what they may feel at a given moment.  This can be a tricky line to walk.  On the one hand, if we tell someone to get it together and move on without allowing them time to heal from genuine wounds, we may just be creating an army of walking wounded.  On the other hand, sometimes sorrow and self-pity can cloud people’s vision and sap their strength, creating a well of despair that it can be very hard to climb up out of.  Illustration:  Crying Children.

 d.  Edification – gives people practical steps to enable them to move from where they are to where they need to be.  Sometimes this means helping them see something about themselves or their situation that they haven’t understood.  In that sense, this kind of encouragement could be called education, but remember that biblical encouragement is about pouring strength into someone so that they can live out God’s will for their lives.  Sometimes we can show people what they need to know, but sometimes it means coming alongside them, putting their arm over your shoulder and loaning them your strength as you take the next few steps together.

Biblical encouragement is discerning in that it offers the kind of encouragement that is most fitting for the situation or for the person who needs to be encouraged.

 3.  Biblical encouragement is personal.

 The only way to know how a person will be most encouraged or what kind of encouragement is required in a particular situation is to know the person you’re trying to encourage.  That’s why the greatest encouragement almost always comes from those who know us best.  Now, this means two things.  First, if you want to be an encouragement to someone, you need to take the time to get to know them, or at the very least, to know the situation they’re facing. This usually means learning how to listen.  Second, if you want someone to encourage you, then you have to be willing to let yourself be known.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress