|
|
|
Los
Angeles Premiere of Darwin's Dilemma at California Science Center on
Oct. 25
The debate
over Darwin will come to California on October 25th, when the
Smithsonian Institution's west coast affiliate premieres Darwin's
Dilemma: The Mystery of the Cambrian Fossil Record, a new intelligent design film
which challenges Darwinian evolution. To view a trailer and clips
from the film, please visit www.darwinsdilemma.org.
Darwin's Dilemma will be screened Sunday, October 25th in the
IMAX theater of the prestigious California Science Center, which
describes itself as "the West Coast's largest hands-on science
center." Sponsored by the American
Freedom Alliance, the premiere starts at 7:00 pm and will also include
a showing of the IMAX film Born
of the Stars as well as a post-screening discussion of Darwin's Dilemma
featuring the film's director Lad Allen; David Berlinski, author of The
Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions;
and biologist Jonathan Wells, author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism
and Intelligent Design. The screening is a
part of The
Darwin Debates, a series of exciting events the American
Freedom Alliance is putting together in honor of the Darwin
anniversary.
For tickets
or more information, call the American Freedom Alliance office at
(310) 444-3085 or visit the group's website here.
Darwin's Dilemma explores one of the great mysteries in the history of
life: the geologically-sudden appearance of dozens of major complex
animal types in the fossil record without any trace of the gradual
transitional steps Charles Darwin had predicted. Frequently described
as "the Cambrian Explosion," the development of these new
animal types required a massive increase in genetic information.
"The big question that the Cambrian Explosion poses is where
does all that new information come from?" says Dr. Stephen
Meyer, a featured expert in the documentary and author of the book Signature
in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design.
The film
previously had regional premieres at the Seattle Art Museum in August
and at the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History last week.
Stay tuned
to Evolution
News & Views as this story develops.
|
|
Leading Darwinist Richard Dawkins Dodges Debates,
Refuses to Defend Evolution as The Greatest Show on Earth
Richard Dawkins, the world's leading
public spokesman for Darwinian evolution and an advocate of the
"new atheism," has refused to debate Dr. Stephen C. Meyer,
a prominent advocate of intelligent design and the author of the
acclaimed Signature
in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design.
"Richard
Dawkins claims that the appearance of design in biology is an
illusion and claims to have refuted the case for intelligent
design," says Dr. Meyer who received his Ph.D. in the philosophy
of science from the University of Cambridge in England.
"But
Dawkins assiduously avoids addressing the key evidence for
intelligent design and won't debate its leading proponents,"
adds Dr. Meyer. "Dawkins says that there is no evidence for
intelligent design in life, and yet he also acknowledges that neither
he nor anyone else has an evolutionary explanation for the origin of
the first living cell. We know now even the simplest forms of life
are chock-full of digital code, complex information processing
systems and other exquisite forms of nanotechnology."
Continue
reading . . .
|
|
The Science of Denial
Biologic Director Douglas Axe special
to ENV:
Scientists sometimes find themselves
wishing things were different. In one sense that's a thoroughly unremarkable
observation. After all, scientists are human, and humans have always
found themselves wishing things were different.
But what if
some of the things scientists wish were different are the very things
they have devoted themselves to studying? In other words, forget
about salaries, teaching loads, and grant funding. What if some
scientists want the brute facts of their own field of study to be
other than what they really are?
As odd as it
may seem, particularly to non-scientists, that tension between
preference and reality has always been a part of doing science. Like
everyone else, scientists don't just have ideas - they favor them...
even promote them.
And for scientists, as for everyone else, sometimes those cherished
ideas are just plain wrong.
For decades
now, a growing minority of scientists have argued that the standard
explanations of biological origins are prime examples this-cherished
ideas that are spectacularly wrong. That raises an interesting
question. If these ideas are really so wrong, why do so many experts
affirm them?
Click
here to continue reading . . .
|
|
Upcoming Events
October
19, 2009
Stephen C. Meyer lecture at King's College
King's College Distinguised Visitors Series
October
23, 2009
David Berlinski Lecture at King's College
King's College Distringuished Visitors Series
October
23 - 24, 2009
Science and Faith: Friends or Foes?
Southwestern Seminary, Fort Worth, TX
October
25, 2009
Los Angeles Premiere of Darwin's Dilemma
At the California Science Center IMAX Theater
October
30 - 31, 2009
The Legacy of Darwin Intelligent Design Conference
Douglas County Event Center, Castle Rock, Colorado
November
17, 2009
Duelling with Darwin: An Evening with G.K. Chesterton
Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, Washington
|
|
|
|
|
ID The Future
Featured Podcast

Abuses of Power in Science: An Interview
With Darwin Skeptic David Berlinski
Click
here to listen.
|
|
Join our
network of financial supporters
Nota Bene is sent
as an outreach of Discovery Institute's Center for Science and
Culture. If you appreciate this newsletter and the scientific,
scholarly, and educational work of the CSC, please consider giving a
donation
today.
|
|